The AFP tonight attacked the release of the "confidential" transcript, sayingWhereas Kevin Andrews releasing partial transcripts (2), or Mick Keelty making weaselly insinuations (3), would not. No, I don't get it either. Just as well we have such fine men to do our thinking for us.
such leaks generated misinformed and speculative reporting. (1)
Though I suspect they may be trying to stupify us into submission with the blatant nature of their idiocy and hypocrisy. Or they are constructing some sort of real-world satirical meta-narrative, though given the intelligence of those involved, that seems unlikely.
1 - "Haneef lawyers release second police interview transcript," unattributed AAP article on stuff.co.nz, 23rd of August, 2007. (http://www.stuff.co.nz/4174387a12.html)
2 - as described on lefthandpalm at an earleir time: http://lefthandpalm.blogspot.com/2007/07/haneefs-internet-chat-more-evasion-and.html)
3 - As described on lefthandpalm at an earlier time: http://lefthandpalm.blogspot.com/2007/08/bit-late.html